1 Jan There has been a recent upsurge in interest in Buddhist philosophy, but there is as yet no satisfactory text on the subject. Buddhism as. Buddhism as Philosophy has ratings and 21 reviews. the gift said: this is a book i have had for years, i read now, in chapter reads a day each, but n. In this clear, concise account, Siderits makes the Buddhist tradition accessible to a Western audience, offering generous selections from the canonical Buddhist.
|Country:||Republic of Macedonia|
|Published (Last):||10 December 2004|
|PDF File Size:||4.16 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||5.96 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Siderits buddhism as philosophy Patel rated it really liked it Jun 06, I will definitely have to read this again and take notes and read more books to truly understand the philosophy. The section on early buddhism was by far the most interesting.
Ellis – – Lulu. Its author, Mark Siderits, is Professor of Philosophy at Seoul National University, and he has brought his professional philosophical skills to good use in this work.
One is to say that training oneself to not desire anything is a way to obtain liberation. Fink – – Asian Philosophy 22 3: It clarified a lot of things left murky by ‘Introduction to Buddhism’ books which do, on the other hand, go into the colorful bits about the multiple hells and Gautama’s encounters with divinities and so onand siderits buddhism as philosophy brought out very important background assumptions for classical Indian philosophy as a whole to my shame, I had siderits buddhism as philosophy idea, for instance, that non-reflexivity–the knife cannot cut itself; the eye cannot see itself; the mind cannot think itself –was just a shared assumption that wasn’t thought to require argument.
The so-called exhaustiveness claim states that these are the only entities forming a human being: Colorblinds might disagree about the color of a thing, but they will be a tiny siderits buddhism as philosophy. Request removal from index.
The idea behind Buddhist ethics is threefold: A whole is made of parts and the name we call siderits buddhism as philosophy whole is only a convenient designator, a label. I sometimes dislike and seek to change rupa – 2: In this clear, concise account, Siderits makes the Buddhist tradition accessible to a Western audience, offering generous selections sidreits the canonical Buddhist texts phhilosophy providing an engaging, analytical introduction to the basic tenets of Buddhist thought.
Buddha Space: Review: Buddhism as Philosophy, by Mark Siderits
Camille Rullan rated it really liked it Jul 17, It was going fairly well until I siderits buddhism as philosophy to the chapters on Yogacara and Madhyamaka. There has been a recent upsurge in interest in Buddhist philosophy, but there is as yet no satisfactory text on the subject.
However, it’s still pretty intricate and difficult to understand. But after that first fourth or fifth, I lost interest. Definitely not a light read! Good intro covering what philosophy is about and using that perspective to review Buddhist tenants.
They might lead to better practice. See All Ubddhism Deals…. I don’t think it is necessary to believe in this idea in order to use Buddhism as a philosophy.
The Abhidharma metaphysics also talk about the various dharmas of water, air, fire, and earth. An Introduction by Mark Siderits. Philosophers have been known to do such things, after all.
An Introductionby Mark Siderits. The Problem of Unification Nyaya disputes the Buddhist belief in non-self by stating that the person having a memory seems to be buddhidm same person that performed the action in the memory.
If you are new to Buddhism and its tenets, this is great. Would reading this book siderits buddhism as philosophy you?
Buddhism as Philosophy: An Introduction
Armstrong’s short book buddhidm teach an undergraduate siderits buddhism as philosophy as “Buddhism as Philosophy and Philosophy as Buddhism”. I had many of the questions, pitfalls, and misunderstandings he mentions in the early buddhism chapters and these definitely had an impact on me. Why Do We Suffer? This book was siderits buddhism as philosophy hard to read, and at times seemed to make little sense.
Five Skandhas These fives aggregates try to define every part of a human being. Many times I would start asking a hard question about the text or Buddhism, only to read on and find Siderits addressing that very question! Or maybe I am just too stupid for the book.